ГУЛаг Палестины
Шрифт:
statistics compiled by the League for Human Rights of B'nai
Brith, anti-Semitism in Canada is at its highest level in a
decade. There were 251 reported incidents of harassment and
vandalism against Jews in Canada in 1991, up 42% from two
years earlier. The reader may feel that anti-Semitism is only a
distant threat. But consider this: many of the sources I sought
in preparing this article are listed as ``missing'' in our
University library. Some articles had been ripped out of
magazines. Others books, though still on the shelves, I found
to contain anti-Semitic or pro-Nazi graffiti. To repeat a saying
attributed to Edmund Burke, "The only thing necessary for evil
to triumph is for good men to do nothing." For Further
Reading: Julian Sher, "White Hoods: Canada's Ku Klux Klan",
New Star Books, Vancouver, 1983. James Ridgeway, "Blood
in the Face", Thunder's Mouth Press, New York, 1991. Russ
Bellant, "Old Nazis, the New Right, and the Republican Party",
South End Press, Boston, 1991. Steve Mertl and John Ward,
"Keegstra: The Trial, The Issues, and The Consequences",
Western Producer Prairie Books, Saskatoon, 1985. James
Coates, "Armed and Dangerous: The Rise of the Survivalist
Right," Hill and Wang, New York, 1987.
About the author.
Jeffrey Shallit, who is not Jewish, is associate professor in the
computer science department at the University of Waterloo.
CODOH comments on Shallit's comments about
Leuchter:
Rothe sells the "Leuchter report" in his store, a book
purporting to be an engineer's refutation of the
existence of gas chambers in Poland. (David Irving
also uses Leuchter's report to support his claims.)
What Rothe will not tell you, however, is that Fred
Leuchter is not an engineer.
Fred Leuchter is self-trained in the extremely arcane field of
execution equipment, and before smears such as Mr. Shallit's
had their effect he worked for numerous state prison systems
in the United States on the repair, upgrading, and replacement
of said equipment. He has done work on gallows, electric
chairs, gas chambers, and in fact is the inventor and builder of
not only the automatic equipment used for lethal injection but
also determined the type and sequence of the four drugs used
to insure maximum comfort and a certain, painless death
when physicians refused to offer any assistance in this area.
At the second Zuendel trial in Canada, the judge recognized
his expertise, and ruled that he was an engineer by virtue of
experience and demonstrated ability, and therefore he would
be allowed to testify as an expert witness regarding gas
chambers. In some other areas, such as crematories, he was
not allowed to testify.
Rothe also won't tell you that, according to the
Boston Globe, Leuchter admitted to illegally collecting
20 pounds of building and soil samples in Poland, and
that Leuchter's "analysis'' has been thoroughly
rebutted in a report by French pharmacist
Jean-Claude Pressac. Pressac "noted that Leuchter
never looked at documents in the Auschwitz Museum,
and failed to study German blueprints of the gas
chambers."
The legality of the collection process has nothing to do with
the validity of the analyses of same. This is but another
example of the attempts to heap all possible negatives
because of the damage his investigations have done to the
accepted myths regarding non-existent gas chambers. His
sample analyses have, in fact, been independently verified by
the later work of both a Polish government commission,
Austrian engineer Walter Leuftl, and the inarguably qualified
German chemist, Germar Rudolf.
Shallit does not indicate if Pressac indicates what relevance
the "documents in the Auschwitz Museum" might have on the
matter. Given that much of what is on display at Auschwitz are
reproductions with obvious liberties taken to closer match
wartime accounts, a fact only admitted in the last few years,
one would have to be wary of whatever they purport to claim is
documentation. And the plain fact is that no "German
blueprints of the gas chambers" exist. What does exist are
blueprints of the various Krema (crematoria) which supporters
of gas chambers claim were "code worded" to hide the actual
use to which they would be put. These blueprints do exist, and
nothing on them supports the gas chamber theory--none of the
special provisions one would expect, such as sealing, gas
introduction equipment, forced air circulation of the closed
room(s) or adequate ventilation are indicated.
After a particularly traumatic cross-examination by the attorney
for Prof. Robert Faurisson, during which Pressac became
incoherent to the point of tears on the stand, he has retreated
from any active defense of his extremely flawed work, and it is
no longer cited by top-level historians. His alleged refutation of
challenges to the existence of gas chambers is a huge
embarrassment of a book now trotted out only by lay people
such as Mr. Shallit, and professional promoters of the gas
chamber myths.
With his false credentials, he convinced authorities in
several states in the U.S. to let him construct
execution machinery for their prisons.
Leuchter presented no false credentials. It is common for