ГУЛаг Палестины

The anonymous letter from MCI mentioned in Documents 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Document 10-b:

another letter (one page) demanding a donation to the Royal Victoria Hospital was included in

the same envelope as the "TB letter".

Document 11

An order-receipt (payment) to pay for the blood test for syphilis, which was never done.

Another document (Document 12) shows that dr. Giannalis uses this laboratory to evaluate

test samples, taken at his office. The blood test for syphilis was not required by Immigration in

my case. It was also mentioned that a patient must only appear for this test in the CDL

Laboratories, in other words samples taken outside CDL Lab are not admitting for evaluation

for syphilis.

Document 12

Strum creatinine test's form from CDL Lab form for my mother. The test was ordered by dr.

Giannakis on Immigration's request and the result was: in norm.

Document 13-a

Front page of the IMS ruling from November 23 letter (received on November 28).

Corresponds to Document 3. Also was mentioned in Documents 1, 4, 6. Document 13-b is the

text of the internal part of the same ruling, addressing to dr. Giannakis.

Document 14-a

Ruling from IMS to my mother, Elisabetha Epstein from January 17 2000. This document is

anonymous, no names, telephone numbers. Document 14-b is the text of the internal part of

the same ruling, addressing to dr. Giannakis.

Document 15-a

Ruling from IMS to my mother, Elisabetha Epstein from June 30 2000. This document is

anonymous, no names, telephone numbers. Document 15-b is the text of the internal part of

the same ruling, addressing to dr. Giannakis.

Document 15 plus

September 2000 - letter from IMS ordering another urine test and then a visit to an urologist.

Document 16

An offensive letter from my mother's new immigration officer from September 18 2000.

Document 17

My mother's, Elisabetha Epstein, response (September 20 2000) to an offensive letter from

Immigration (see Document 16).

Document 18

Copy of the positive response to our humanitarian appeal

Document 19

An order from January 11 2000 to my wife, Alla, to undergo the medical examination. Only my

wife's name mentioned in this letter. This letter is a proof that refusing to include all family

members Immigration stalling the completion of our file almost one year now.

Document 20

An order from October 26 2000 to me and my daughter Marta to undergo medical

examination. Was submitted in contradiction with the previous Immigration's assurance that

only my wife has to undergo medical examination.

Document 21-a

X-ray result from Le Centre Radiologique Clarke from November 14 2000, which tremendously

contradict the Immigration's x-ray from November 01 2000 evaluation. In response to TB

double-check request (see Document 21-b) it said "NIL ACTIVE". The film was evaluated by 3

medical doctors, which came to the same "nil active" conclusion. I was seen and evaluated by

2 medical doctors since October 29, who found the TB suspicion ridiculous.

Document 22

X-ray result from November 22 1994 from the Centre Hospitalier Reddy Memorial. On request

of W. Brzezinska, M.D. if there is recent pulmonary infiltrate it said "no recent pulmonary

infiltrate shown".

Document 23

Mr. Z. JAST's certificate for Immigration in relation to the x-ray dispute.

Document 24

Internet-links to two publications, which might accelerate persecutions.

Document 25-a,b

IMS final decision in my mother's case from Dec. 5 2000.

Document 26

Document 27

List of "civil" events. Relates to our will to contribute to the society.

Lev GUNIN December 2 2000 Montreal

COPY - DOCUMENT NUMBER ONE

To Immigration's Canada Complaint Board

(faxes: [phone] [phone]) November 30 2000

From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)

This is the complaint on actions and decisions, which my advisers and I found inadmissible, like

attempts to cause damage to my mother's and my heath. Theoretically falsification and blatant

manipulation of medical data can lead to a forcible treatment from diseases, which one do not

have (it could be lethal).

.

I submit you 5 documents. The First is this one. Second is a complaint against refusal to allow

all my family members medical examinations half a year ago. Third is my disagreement with the

decision of Immigration Health Services from November 23, 2000. Fourth is a shortened

description of events, which manifested abuse of power, ungrounded secrecy, misconduct and

criminal manipulation of medical data. Fifth is a copy of a complaint made to Montreal Chest

Institute. Sixth is a wider description of events, with more astonishing and outraged details.

However, because of the length of the Sixth document its submission by fax could be found

offensive, so, please, tell me where to send it by post or e-mail.

I would like to know:

A) Who made all mentioned in six documents unjust decisions (names, position, what their role

in my file).

B) On what ground (law, paragraph, circumstances).

C) Who made a decision, based on a single x-ray: to consider me a potential TB carrier and

submitted it not to Mr. Giannakis, M.D. but to the Royal Victoria Hospital, depriving me and

doctor Giannakis of a minimal choice to choose where to turn for further evaluation. Is the MCI

radiology unit a part of IMS (ImmMedSrv)?