ГУЛаг Палестины

D) If the x-ray film (made at MCI) could be obtained for copying. My legal advisers and me - we

want to ask you to show it to us at 1010 St Antoine, Montreal. We want to check:

E) If a) there is any technical defect or underwear shadow, which was offensively interpreted

as "TB" b) this x-ray matches my body constitution c) an obviously normal result was blatantly

interpreted as "abnormal". We would like to be given a permission to take this film or its copy to

medical specialists to determine it.

F) How all contradictions, deceptions, violations can be explained (each event).

G) Examples: a) Half a year ago IMS officials refused to submit us ruling and forms for medical

examination for all family members assuring us that only my wife has to go through them. Now

in contradiction with what was said before they ordered my younger daughter and me (now

omitting my older daughter) to do examinations. B) Why my mother's file was illegally attached

to mine. c) How could so many ungrounded medical tests be ruled for my mother, keeping her

more then one year (!) in limbo, etc.

H) How all such decisions might be appealed?

I) Has my mother and me same IMS agents or agents of the same unit? Who are supervisors

of all agents, attached to our files (including Immigration Medical Services - IMS).

J) How to reach them?

K) If Immigration's agents (IMS included) are subjects of Criminal Code - or they are

completely uncontrolled and impunitive.

L) If they are not (impunitive) what is the way to complain about

1. Deliberate damage of my (my family's) financial, social, and psychological situation.

2. Criminal manipulation of the medical data

M) How could I know if W. Brzezinska's M.D. rapport with a "concern" about my health

presents not only in my mother's but in my file as well?

N) Why my file is proceeding not on Montreal - as normally - but in Ottawa?

I must warn you that I will contact police or RCMP in case of any further anonymous calls

("private call" indication) from Immigration and will disregard any letters, until they will not be

signed and carry the name and phone number of the person who is responsible for the

decision. All anonymous telephone calls, which accuse me of concealing a number of

infectious diseases, must be stopped. Anonymous letters from hospitals on behalf of

Immigration with same insinuations are unacceptable as well. I have also received a receipt for

a blood test for syphilis, which I never did, from a Lab, where I never went. I was also called by

two other laboratories, which pretend that I did tests for infectious diseases, and this is not

true. All such provocation must be stopped immediately!

.

All 5 (or 6) documents must be evaluated to consider and answer my complaint. Please,

answer all questions, which arise from the documents. I ask you to respond to this complaint in

writing. However, another solution is just to consider my case as "finished" with no further

demands. Will appreciate your cooperation.

Yours,

Lev GUNIN

November 30 2000

Chronology in GUNINS' case

November 1994

refugee claim

March 1997

refugee claim rejected.

(In the negative decision our refugee

claim description was severely

distorted; document includes such

direct and indirect statements as a)

nothing bad could happen in such a

beautiful country like Israel, b) people

who were taken to Israel for

Sochnut's expense are property of

Israel, c) people who refused to

change their believes and opinions

are guilty on persecutions themselves

because provoked them c) no

minimum of confidence). January

1998

– Federal Court closing our case on a

ridiculous ground of Immigration's "no

minimal confidence" ruling.

January 2000

– positive decision in response to our

humanitarian appeal.

March 2000

an interview lead to the Certificat de

selectione du Quebec issuing by

Quebec's Immigration

March 2000

bureaucratic humiliation and blatant

manipulation of medical data by

Federal Immigration starts to torpid

the completion of the case

Chronology in

Elisabetha GUNIN (Epstein's)

case:.1994

refugee claim + Wanda Brzezinska,

M.D. makes a false report (see Doc.

4b, 7a, 7b).

March 1997

refugee claim rejected.

January 1998

– Federal Court closing our case on a

ridiculous ground of Immigration's "no

minimal confidence" ruling.

November 1998

marriages a Canadian citizen

November 22 1999

my mother's marriage interview.

Nov. 23, Madame Helene ROY

replaces the initiative negative

decision, based on "medical

concerns" (dr. Brzezinska's rapport),

by a positive one.

January 2000 - Certificat de

selectione du Quebec was issued for

my mother.

January 2000, a ruling from IMS

ordering my mother additional tests:

strum creatinine (blood test) and

echocardiogram.

June 30, 2000 - IMS ridiculous

demand of a resume from "the last

visit to cardiologist".

July 27 2000

– rapport of Dr. Gordon Creenstein

(anatomy, not pathology) was

submitted to Immigration.

September 2000

another letter from IMS ordering