Личностный потенциал. Структура и диагностика
Шрифт:
Huber N. An experiential leadership approach for teaching tolerance for ambiguity // Journal of Education for Business. 2003. Sept. – Oct. Vol. 79. P. 52–56.
Jaensch E.R.Der gegentypus. Leipzig: Barth, 1938.
Kirton M.J.A reanalysis of two scales of tolerance of ambiguity // Journal of Personality Assessment. 1981. Vol. 45. № 4. P. 407–414.
Kreitler S., Maguen T., Kreitler H.The three faces of intolerance of ambiguity. Alemania // Archiv f"ur psychologie. 1975. № 127. № 3–4. P. 238–250.
Lane M. S., Klenke K.The ambiguity tolerance interface: a modified social cognitive model for leading under uncertainty // Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 2004. Vol. 10. P. 69–82.
Ladouceur R. Talbot F., Dugas M.J.Behavioral expressions of intolerance of uncertainty in worry. Experimental findings // Behav. Modif. 1997. Vol. 21. № 3. P. 355–371.
MacDonald A.P. (Jr.)Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: reliability and validity // Psychological Reports. 1970. № 26. P. 791–798.
Madhubalan V.Individual differences in need for precision // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1997. July. Vol. 23. № 7. P. 717–736.
Mclain D.L.The MSTAT-I: a new measure of an individual’s tolerance for ambiguity // Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1993. № 53. P. 183–189.
Nunnally J.Psychometric theory. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
Nutt P.C.The Tolerance for Ambiguity and Decision Making // The Ohio State University College of Business Working Paper Series, March 1988. P. 88—291.
Norton R.W.Measurement of ambiguity tolerance // Journal of Personality Assessment. 1975. Vol. 39. № 6. P. 607–619.
O’Malley W.J.A tolerance for ambiguity: catholicism, cover story // America. 1993. Oct. 2. Vol. 169. № 9. P. 7—14.
Owen W., Sweeney R.Ambiguity tolerance, performance, learning, and satisfaction: a research direction // The Proceedings of ISECON (San Antonio). 2002. Vol. 19. P. 242–248.
Pawlicki R.E.Relationship between locus of control and tolerance for ambiguity // Psychological reports. 1972. № 31 (1). P. 102.
Pittavino S.Interpersonal space, locus of control and tolerance for ambiguity: Dissertation Abstracts International. 1977. № 38 (1-b). P. 375.
Raphael D., Chasen M.Intolerance of Ambiguity and Life Status During Early Adulthood: A Three Year Follow-Up // Psychological Reports. 1980. № 47. P. 388–390.
Ray J.J.Intolerance of ambiguity among psychologists: a comment on Maier and Lavrakas // Sex Roles. 1987. Vol. 16. № 11–12. P. 559–562.
Ray J.J.Are psychologists intolerant of ambiguity, 1990. URL: http://jonjayray.tripod.com/intamb.html.
Reber A.S., Reber E.The Penguin dictionary of psychology. 3rd ed. L.; N.Y.: Penguin Books, 2001.
Rense L., Schredl M., Houran J.What precognitive dreams are made of: the nonlinear dynamics of tolerance of ambiguity, dream recall, and paranormal belief // Dynamical Psychology: an international interdisciplinary journal of complex mental processes. 2000–2001. URL: http://goertzel.org/dynapsyc/2000/Precog%20Dreams.htm.
Rydell S.Tolerance of ambiguity and semantic differential ratings // Psychological Reports. 1996. № 19. P. 1303–1312.
Shotter J.The necessity for ambiguity if we are to achieve communication. Conference paper in J. Visser (Chair), Ambiguity, cognition, learning, teaching and design. International Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), Anaheim (CA). October 22–26, 2003. URL: http://www.learndev.org/ambiguity.html.
Stoycheva K.Talent, science and education: how do we cope with uncertainty and ambiguities – Sofia. URL: http://www.chaperone.sote.hu/katya.htm.
Stoycheva K., Lubart T.The Nature of Creative Decision Making // Decision Making: Social and Creative Dimensions / C. Allwood, M. Selart (Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. P. 15–33.
Tatzel M.Tolerance for Ambiguity in Adult College Students // Psychological Reports. 1980. № 47. P. 377–378.
Taylor P. A.Strategies for enhancing student learning by managing ambiguities in clinical settings // Nurse Educator. 2000. July/August. № 25 (4). P. 173–174.
Tegano D.Relationship of tolerance of ambiguity and playfulness to creativity // Psychological Reports. 1990. № 66. P. 1047–1056.
Thom R.Structural stability and morphogenesis. N.Y.: Benjamin-Addison-Wesley, 1975.
Vigano la Rosa D.L.Autoritarismo e intolerancia a la ambig"uedad en la cultura mexicana, D.F. // Tesis para obtener el grado de maestro en psicolog'ia, UNAM. M'exico, 1986.
Visser M.«Inverted Commas»: a critical reflection on ambiguity in the context of HIV/AIDS // Ambiguity, ognition, learning, teaching, and design: workshop and special panel session held at the International Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Anaheim (CA). October 22–25, 2003. URL: http://www.learndev.org/ambiguity.html.
Visser Y. L.Ambiguity in learning: issues and implications for instructional design // Ambiguity, ognition, learning, teaching, and design: workshop and special panel session held at the International Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Anaheim (CA). October 22–25, 2003. URL: http://www.learndev.org/ambiguity.html.
Waxler M.The role of ambiguity and tolerance of ambiguity in the appreciation of humor // Dissertation Abstracts International. 1976. № 37 (6-b). P. 3056–3057.
Wittenberg K.J., Norcross J.C.Practitioner perfectionism: relationship to ambiguity tolerance and work satisfaction // Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2001. Vol. 57. № 12. P. 1543–1550.
Wolfradt, U., Pretz, J.E.Individual differences in creativity: personality, story writing, and hobbies // European Journal of Personality. 2001. Vol. 15. № 4. P. 297–310.