Политическая наука №4 / 2016. Государства в современном мире: Новые подходы к исследованию
Шрифт:
Linz J.J., Stepan A. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. – Baltimore; L.: The Johns Hopkins univ. press, 1996. – 504 p.
MacLaren M. «Sequentialism» or «gradualism»? On the transition to democracy and the rule of law /WP 38. National Center of Competence in Research: Challenges to Democracy in the 21 st Century. – Bern: Swiss national science foundation, 2009. – Mode of access:(Дата посещения: 06.08.2016.)
Mann M. The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms and results // European journal of sociology. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1984. – Vol. 25, N 02. – P. 185–213.
Mansfield E.D., Snyder J.L. The sequencing
Marshall M.G. Polity IV project, political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2015 / Center for systemic peace. – 2016 b. – Mode of access:(Дата посещения: 05.08.2016.)
Marshall M.G. Major episodes of political violence (MEPV) and conflict regions, 1946–2015. – 2016 a. – Mode of access:MEPVcodebook2015.pdf (Дата посещения: 06.08.2016.)
Mazzuca S.L., Munck G.L. State or democracy first? Alternative perspectives on the state-democracy nexus // Democratization. – L., 2014. – Vol. 21, N 7. – P. 1221–1243.
McGuire J.W. Political regime and social performance // Contemporary Politics. – L., 2013. – Vol. 19, N 1. – P. 55–75.
Melville A., Stukal D., Mironyuk M. Trajectories of regime transformation and types of stateness in post-communist countries // Perspectives on European politics and society. – L.: Taylor & Francis, 2013. – Vol. 14, N 4. – P. 431–459.
Migdal J.S. Strong societies and weak states: state-society relations and state capabilities in the Third World. – Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1988. – 320 p.
Moller J., Skaaning S.E. Stateness first? // Democratization. – L., 2011. – Vol. 18, N 1. – P. 1–24.
Nettl J.P. The state as a conceptual variable // World politics. – Cambridge, 1968. – Vol. 20, N 4. – P. 559–592.
O’Donnell G., Schmitter P.C., Whitehead L. Transitions from authoritarian rule: comparative perspectives. – Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins univ. press, 1986. – 208 p.
Olson M. Dictatorship, democracy, and development // American political science review. – Cambridge, 1993. – Vol. 87, N 3. – P. 567–576.
Ottervik M. Conceptualizing and measuring state capacity. – Gothenburg, 2013. – Vol. 2013, N 20. – 39 p. – (QoG Working Paper Series).
Political atlas of the modern world / A. Melville (ed.). – Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. – 256 p.
Roberts C., Sherlock T. Bringing the russian state back in: explanations of the derailed transition to market democracy // Comparative politics. – N.Y., 1999. – P. 477–498.
Roller E. Comparing the performance of autocracies: issues in measuring types of autocratic regimes and performance // Contemporary politics. – L.: Taylor & Francis, 2013. – Vol. 19, N 1. – P. 35–54.
Rose R., Shin D. Democratization backwards: the problem of third-wave democracies // British journal of political science. – Cambridge, 2001. – Vol. 31, N 2. – P. 331–354.
Rotberg R.I. The challenge of weak, failing, and collapsed states // Leashing the dogs of war. – Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace, 2007. – P. 83–94.
Rustow D.A. Transitions to democracy: toward a dynamic model // Comparative politics. – N.Y., 1970. – Vol. 2, N 3. – P. 337–363.
Scheuerman W.E. Postnational democracies without postnational states? Some skeptical reflections // Ethics & Global politics. – Stockholm, 2009. – Vol. 2, N 1. – P. 41–63.
Schmitter P., Wagemann C., Obydenkova A. Democratization and state capacity // Paper for X Congresso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administracion Publica. – Santiago, Chile, 2005. – Mode of access:(Дата
посещения: 05.08.2016.)Singer J.D., Bremer S., Stuckey J. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820–1965 // Peace, war, and numbers / B. Russett (ed.). – Thousand Oaks, 1972. – 352 p.
Slater D. Can Leviathan be democratic? Competitive elections, robust mass politics, and state infrastructural power // Studies in comparative international development (SCID). – Berlin, 2008. – Vol. 43, N 3–4. – P. 252–272.
Soifer H. State infrastructural power: approaches to conceptualization and measurement // Studies in comparative international development (SCID). – Berlin, 2008. – Vol. 43, N 3–4. – P. 231–251.
Soifer H., Vom Hau M. Unpacking the strength of the state: the utility of state infrastructural power // Studies in comparative international development (SCID). – Berlin, 2008. – Vol. 43, N 3–4. – P. 219–230.
Spruyt H. The sovereign state and its competitors: An analysis of systems change. – Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1996. – 304 p.
Svolik M.W. The politics of authoritarian rule. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2012. – 258 p.
Tansey O. Democratization without a state: democratic regime-building in Kosovo // Democratization. – L., 2007. – Vol. 14, N 1. – P. 129–150.
The logic of political survival / B. Bueno de Mesquita, A. Smith, R. Siverson, J. Morrow. – Cambridge; L.: Cambridge univ. press, 2003. – 550 p.
The performance of nations / J. Kugler, R.L. Tammen (eds). – Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield publishers, 2012. – 348 p.
Thies C.G. Of rulers, rebels, and revenue: state capacity, civil war onset, and primary commodities // Journal of peace research. – Thousand Oaks, 2010. – Vol. 47, N 3. – P. 321–332.
Thompson W.R., Ganguly S. Ascending India and its state capacity. – New Haven: Yale univ. press, 2016. – 352 p.
Tilly Ch. Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990–1990. – Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1990. – 288 p.